{"id":3674,"date":"2014-02-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2014-02-13T11:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ourplanet.org\/david-keith-a-scientific-pro-geoengineering-insider-talking-it-all-up\/"},"modified":"2023-05-11T18:56:30","modified_gmt":"2023-05-11T05:56:30","slug":"david-keith-a-scientific-pro-geoengineering-insider-talking-it-all-up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ourplanet.org\/greenplanetfm\/david-keith-a-scientific-pro-geoengineering-insider-talking-it-all-up\/","title":{"rendered":"David Keith a Scientific pro GeoEngineering insider talking it all up"},"content":{"rendered":"

Note: Massey University in NZ is openly discussing this as an option.
\n \n <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

A New Zealand University gets in to the action regarding Geo-Engineering. <\/b>\n<\/p>\n

This is very interesting ... Is the Status Quo endeavoring to 'soften up the public' so that more tinkering with the earths atmospheric envelope can take us closer to the brink?  Up until now, according to www.Geoengineeringwatch.org<\/a> this has been going on for years, and as we notice the weather becoming more and more ambiguous, it is also getting more awakening people 'looking up' - researching and asking questions and ... thinking what is it they are doing? <\/strong>\n<\/p>\n

 This is the link:  http:\/\/www.massey.ac.nz\/massey\/about-massey\/news\/article.cfm?mnarticle_uuid=536E4B82-C78D-9F68-89D8-CE947A65F0AC<\/p>\n

<\/a>Climate engineering \u2013 What do the public think?  <\/strong><\/span> 
\n (January 12, 2014).<\/span>\n<\/p>\n

Researchers from Massey University (New Zealand) and the University of Southampton (United Kingdom) have undertaken the first systematic large-scale evaluation
\n of the public reaction to climate engineering. The work is published in Nature Climate Change this week (January 12, 2014).??<\/p>\n

Climate engineering is the deliberate large-scale manipulation of the environment to counteract climate change. Some scientists think such approaches will
\n be required to combat the increasing rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) due to the burning of fossil fuels.<\/p>\n

Climate engineering could involve techniques that reduce the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere or approaches that slow temperature rise by reducing the amount
\n of sunlight reaching the Earth\u2019s surface. <\/p>\n

My response to Massey University.\"Undecided\"\n<\/p>\n

Geo engineering is going to up the anti, hugely, as the 'engineers' doing this are so disconnected from nature, and have zero understanding of the web
\n of life, that they will inevitably encounter a synthetic version of Newtons 3rd Law of Motion coming back at them and us - that we will end up degrading
\n the biosphere even faster. See the wild debate going on www.Geoengineeringwatch.org  - We can not leave this to academics and business interests.
\n We need full transparency and a national debate, that ties in with an open international debate. We also have to factor children and grandchildren into this too<\/strong><\/span>,
\n as well as all of the earths biota. See 1.32 minute video at the bottom of the page, regarding children.<\/em><\/span>\n<\/p>\n

Here below is David Keith, a very flippant scientific mind, talking at a conference about stratospheric geo-engineereing, where he glibly states. \"And by the way, it's not really a moral hazard, it's more like free riding on our grandkids.\"
This is a very serious acknowledgement by an insider. I am sure his handlers would have been VERY HOSED OFF, with him by letting the cat out of the bag!<\/b>\n<\/p>\n

\n