What they say they are doing - nobody can complain. But, what they are actually planning and what it means when you understand their point of view and
\n their goals - you see that it is completely different than the \u2018catch phrases\u2019 they are using - especially when \u2018they\u2019 bring it forward to the peoples
\n attention.
\n \n<\/p>\n
The whole gamut of Roy\u2019s interview is that corporations and the elite, are in lockstep with big \u2018global\u2019 governance aim - to lure us, \u201cwe the people\u201d -
\n into \u2018agreements.\u2019
\n \n<\/p>\n
Agenda 21 which was in 9 parts has now morphed to Agenda 2030 - of 13 points - since 1992 and its signing by 178 countries at the Earth Summit<\/a> (United Nations Conference on Environment and Development) held in Rio de Janeiro<\/a>, Brazil. It is being overseen by the UN, other multilateral<\/a> organizations, and individual governments around the world - that can be enacted at local, national, and global levels. So essentially the agenda is looking at our planet earth and the whole biosphere to see what measures can be taken to stop pollution, the destruction of So who could argue that these all need to be urgently addressed for the future of all children and grandchildren? Agenda 21 also focuses on population growth, poverty, health and the disenfranchisement of the poor. Indigenous peoples, women, NGO\u2019s and their place in Finally where does science fit into this mix? Agenda 21 is a 350-page document divided into 40 chapters that have been grouped into 4 sections:[citation needed<\/a>]<\/p>\n The interview starts with Roy immediately stating that this is not a people friendly agenda. That it is a depopulation agenda - he does not mince words. So I ask him, what is it that he thinks\/sees is problematic? The big one he says is the word Sustainable<\/strong><\/em> - it is a word that can conjure up many different meanings.<\/p>\n A sustainable business is just one that is able to continue doing business for as long as it takes. Which every business wants to do anyway. You can have sustainable forests or a fishery, that you keep maintaining at a certain rate or level - but it\u2019s only maintaining<\/em> - where it needs to be regenerated-<\/strong> where it needs to be cherished as nature - not just using it as a resource. The word sustainability has been superseded by the word Regeneration<\/strong> - as regeneration means to put back more. That there is an eternal Of replenishing nature, of giving back whole heartedly. <\/p>\n However Agenda 21 does not talk in terms of regeneration of the biosphere. <\/em>\n<\/p>\n Energy production today involves the largest planetary change that we have upon us and we are being held hostage by vested interests of the massive fossil Big Oil & Fossil Fuel Thwart & Constrain<\/strong> - new energy systems.It is known that from leading edge physics and its point of view, So yes, ordinary everyday physics proves it\u2019s possible. The whole universe is structured as 'an over unity device\u2019 - the sun continues to put out endless See The Thrive Movie - https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=OibqdwHyZxk<\/a> 3 minute trailer. This tells us exceptionally clearly what the challenge is.<\/p>\n Roy states there are numerous desktop type \u2018energy machines\u2019 being produced - however he says the challenge is around scaling them up to be able to service Yet, the Deep State for want of a far better word - control the narrative and the agenda - that is ... \u2018don\u2019t subvert or compete with the status quo!\u2019 Roy mentions magnets and magnetism saying the energy behind what is magnetic - is a science that we know so little about - actions and reactions and forces Nikola Tesla is mentioned and his quote \u201cThe day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the Roy says that this is a very important point - as it is invisible forces that are taking humanities lives away as of right now - in this era.<\/p>\n That science does not study and research the invisible is fraught with danger and in fact what we may think as toys are in actuality - weapons. <\/p>\n With Roy emphasising that we have to learn and study these invisible forces<\/strong> and like every other thing in the universe, energy can be With Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 he asserts that inside these \u2019nice goals\u2019 - and the \u2018catch phrases\u2019 they say - is how all their newly acquired advantages, He firmly said - that microwaves are not good for humans - end of story. No matter what level, what intensity, what frequency - microwaves are not good We today are immersed in them. \u2018We are living in a microwave oven\u2019 and now we have wifi all over us - with the addition of satellites above - following Walter Russell <\/strong>- unknown genius. Another one of the invisibles comes up with Fukushima in Japan and the continuous belching into the Pacific Ocean of nuclear radiation still today. Roy He mentions that \u2018nuclear situations\u2019 can appear where matter disassociates and starts to fall apart - because all of nature is based on balance - the dynamics of the atom - the electron and the neutron inside the atom etc. So the imperative is recognising that our science is running far ahead of our collective consciousness and this is why we today are in the disconnected un-peaceful situation we have on earth. Because \u2018we\u2019 the ordinary person doing life, have been separated away from the decision making process - and for some time.<\/em>\n<\/p>\n Nikola Tesla to Walter Russell \u201clock up this (Cosmic) knowledge in a safe for 1,000 years until man is ready for it.\u201d www.Philosophy.org<\/p>\n It was George Herbert Bush, ex head of the CIA who was Vice President of the US for 8 years and President for 4 years who initiated this document and signed
<\/strong>\n<\/p>\n
\n habitat, the halting of species extinction and the uncontrolled exploitation and extraction of non renewable resources everywhere. This includes the
\n rampant use of bio-technology and dealing with radioactive waste.
\n \n<\/p>\n
<\/strong>\n<\/p>\n
\n this Agenda, plus multinational corporations, farmers and communities from villages all the way up to now what we call super cities of the world.
\n \n<\/p>\n
\n \n<\/p>\nThe Document
<\/h3>\nSection I: Social and Economic Dimensions<\/strong> is directed toward combating poverty, especially in developing countries<\/a>, changing consumption patterns, promoting health, achieving a more sustainable population, and sustainable settlement in decision making.[citation needed<\/a>]<\/h4>\n
\n
\n management of biotechnology<\/a>, and radioactive wastes<\/a>.<\/li>\n
\n education<\/a>, international institutions<\/a>, and financial mechanisms.[ citation needed<\/a>]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n He emphatically states that the wording is so compelling that any ordinary person would only want to countenance such sentiment. It reads well and
\n sounds good - it appeals to common sense - but look at the deeper levels of it. Who is calling the shots?
\n \n<\/p>\n
\n \n<\/p>\nThe word Sustainable
<\/h3>\n
\n \n<\/p>\n
\n \n<\/p>\n
\n component to it. Regeneration has an optimism and can also be seen as a sacred act.
\n \n<\/p>\nEnergy and Energy Production.
<\/h3>\n
\n fuel and oil cartel. They do not and will not budge an inch, from their extractive and polluting industrial ways. They are controlling the agenda.<\/p>\n
\n you can receive more energy out than you put into a system - yet the status quo says - oh, the 'perpetual motion machine' - and they scoff and demonise
\n this in total - including the inventors as well - there is a constant refusal to acknowledge that this is possible (listen to Alvin Crosby\u2019s interview
\n of two weeks ago, where he proved that it\u2019s attainable with water).<\/p>\n
\n amounts of energy. How can this be? So the whole science and the physics is showing us, that there are other equations.
\n \n<\/p>\n
\n \n<\/p>\n
\n the greater population. Yet, when someone does find the \u2018over unity\u2019 toroidal donut <\/em>equation and produces a viable unit - they then go and
\n patent it - because they inherently know that it\u2019s very difficult to find that \u2018unique mathematical combination.\u2019 But, what invariably happens, that
\n there at the patents office - this 'key global - nodal point\u2019 - sitting in a very strategic \u2018location\u2019 are officials that are tasked to scrutinise
\n all such 'gifts to humanity\u2019 - where it then is essentially suppressed - usually with such hefty fees etc - and this has been happening since the 1930\u2019s.
\n \n<\/p>\n
\n \n<\/p>\n
\n and energies and that it is a \u2018complete science\u2019 - which we have in essence ignored. It works in tandem with gravity, electricity, it works into generation
\n and yet magnetism is not taught!<\/strong>
\n \n<\/p>\n
\n previous centuries of its existence.\u201d
\n \n<\/p>\nInvisible Forces
<\/h3>\n
\n used for good or used for bad. He says we have had these invisible systems suppressed from our knowing. Yet covertly, \u2018the powers that be<\/em>\u2019
\n are researching and advancing these technologies in secret and they are using them to help consolidate their power whilst using these technologies
\n against us.<\/p>\n
\n are used against us. Though not mentioned in this interview - the plan to deploy 5 G wireless - was not the subject of Roy\u2019s interview, he knows a
\n huge amount about it - however he had too many other subjects he wanted to speak to.
\n \n<\/p>\nMicrowaves are detrimental to biological beings.<\/h3>\n
\n for human beings!<\/p>\n
\n us … there are so many things that are impacting our life. All being on the invisible platform of vibratory and frequency impact - on our consciousness
\n and our health. Look at today\u2019s increasing health statistics.
\n \n<\/p>\n
\n \n<\/p>\n
\n mentions that Walter Russell and his wife Tao wrote a book in the 1950s called \u2018Atomic Suicide\u2019 about the impact of radiation and playing with the
\n hidden building blocks of the Universe. In this book Walter Russell a poly math - stated that nuclear energy is wrong! That it creates a danger at
\n every level that it is used. Listen<\/p>\nQuote:
<\/h3>\nWith other facets of the Agenda 21
<\/h3>\n
\n off on it. Then Roy says that it was Margaret Evans, Mayor of Hamilton here in NZ who signed it and adopted it to make Hamilton a model city for Agenda
\n 21.<\/p>\n